Assessing psychological violence and harassment at work: reliability and i.e., Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) and. ventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) Leymann defines .. el LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological. Terrorization) en. Important note in preface to Heinz Leymann, “Mobbing . questionnaire ( Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization, Leymann, ).
|Published (Last):||10 August 2010|
|PDF File Size:||2.30 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.68 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Psycholoical the true from the false]. I have fewer opportunities for training and for preparing myself adequately than those that are offered to other colleagues.
Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT)
Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: Exposure to at least one form of bullying within the previous 12 months, weekly or more, and for at least six months for the LIPT; a total score of 45 or over for the NAQ-R. Average responses for column A responses frequency and column B responses more than the colleagues were calculated for the total sample.
Intensity of psychological violence was well concordant with other scales of workplace bullying, i.
Both LIPT and NAQ-R may be sensitive for measurement of psychological violence, since when psychological violence becomes severe, it would increase the risk of psychological harassment at work as well.
January 11, [Advance Publication] Released: Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0. La investigacion estuvo orientada a establecer las propiedades psicometricas del Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization LIPT para lo cual se realizo la aplicacion del instrumento a trabajadores y trabajadoras activos que asistieron al Instituto Nacional de Prevencion, Salud y Seguridad Laborales, especificamente a la Direccion de Salud de los Trabajadores Diresat ubicado en los estados: While the first factor explained a large proportion of the variance, the IVAPT seems to have a unique factor structure in the Japanese sample.
The surgeon and social media: In this study, there was no significant difference among sex in any of these prevalences, which is similar to previous results of Aldrete et al. The instructions, items and response options of the IVAPT were first translated from the English version into Japanese by a professional translator. The objective of this study was to examine reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Inventory of Violence and Psychological Harassment IVAPT Pando,a item measure of psychological harassment at work and presence and intensity of psychological violence widely used in Latin American countries.
Sign In Join Now. This is almost consistent with previous studies using these three instruments.
Twitter as a tool for practicing surgeons. Any opportunities that I may have for a promotion or improvement in my work are blocked or impeded. February 15, Revised: The Japanese version of the IVAPT showed high internal consistency reliability according to Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the total sample psycholoigcal for both sexes.
Propiedades pzychological del leymann inventory of psychological terrorization LI PT While we used the original criteria to define psychological violence and harassment at work based on the IVAPT, the cut-off may vary from country to country. Distinguir lo verdadero de lo falso [Bullying at work. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of internal consistency reliability was calculated for column A responses and column B responses for the total sample, men and women.
Assessing Psychological Violence and Inventkry at Work: The instrument could be useful in international comparison studies of psychological violence and harassment at work between Latin American countries and Japan, as well as other countries, and in studies intending to differentiate psychological violence and harassment at work.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
New jobs are unceasingly assigned to me. The average duration SD of employment was For interpretation, the presence of psychological violence at work was defined based on conflict situations at work that, when not resolved, can be habitual behavior. Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.
The column A responses were subjected to a factor analysis using principal component analysis with varimax rotation. Already have an account? In an exploratory factor analysis, eigenvalues and the total variance explained were Follow us on Twitter or Facebook to stay on top of the latest in scientific research. Obstetrics and Gynecology J Occup Health ; Also, there were many respondents who failed to fill in column B. Revista Mexicana de Salud en el Trabaj ; 1: This instrument consists of 22 items with two sets of response options see Appendix.
Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization adult bullying questionnaire. A replication study is needed among blue-collar workers and in private sectors. References in periodicals archive? My errors or small faults are punished much more drastically than the rest of my colleagues. Eur J Work Organ Psychol ; 5: Archives des Maladies Professionnelles ; 2: G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; Length Index Preserving Transform lossless text transformation.
I am criticized in my work in such a way that I now doubt my capacity to do my job well.