Jerry Fodor’s Modularity of Mind is a beginning [It] is the first major monograph in this century to explore some variations on faculty psychology [and] is the best. Where Fodor (, ) draws the line of modularity at the Perceptual plasticity and theoretical neutrality: A reply to Jerry Fodor. John C. Marshall, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, – Alvin Liberman, Yale University, President, Haskins Laboratories ” Jerry Fodor’s “Modularity of Mind “is a.
Author: | Faujinn Kagadal |
Country: | Central African Republic |
Language: | English (Spanish) |
Genre: | Sex |
Published (Last): | 1 February 2004 |
Pages: | 88 |
PDF File Size: | 13.29 Mb |
ePub File Size: | 17.79 Mb |
ISBN: | 216-4-88869-342-9 |
Downloads: | 65535 |
Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Uploader: | Dura |
Mirror Sites View this site from another server: Spencer Fodod rated it it was amazing Oct 03, Second, he points to what look to be top-down effects on visual and linguistic processing, the existence of which would tell against cognitive impenetrability, i. Interesting cognitive science text that illuminates certain cognitive functions.
Modularity of Mind (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Strong localization at the level of input systems, then, entails the existence jerrh a one-to-one mapping between input systems and brain structures. Refresh and try again. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. This is referred to as ‘epistemic boundedness’, and is the final topic of the book. This is taken to indicate that other domains, including one’s beliefs, cannot influence such processes.
That’s not the case for something like H2O or other chemical structures. For Fodor, significant parts of the mind, such as perceptual and linguistic processes, are structured in terms of modules, or “organs”, which are mpdularity by their causal and functional roles.
AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally. Contents Four Accounts of Mental Structure.
There are flaws tessellated throughout the book. What is a mental module? The Modularity of Mind: Proponents of other models of the mind argue that the computational theory of mind is no better at explaining human behavior than a theory with mind entirely a product of the environment.
Modularity of Mind
Thus, the hypothesis at issue for theorists like Carruthers might be best understood as the conjunction of two claims: That leaves the third option: A role of effort and intent. Jun 05, Stas Sajin rated it it was ok Shelves: Standard examples from the study of vision include prosopagnosia impaired face recognitionachromatopsia total color blindnessand akinetopsia motion blindness ; examples from the study of language include agrammatism loss of complex syntaxjargon aphasia loss of complex semanticsalexia loss of object wordsand dyslexia impaired reading and writing.
Jerry Alan Fodor is an American philosopher and cognitive scientist. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology The crux of this argument is the modularitj that complex biological systems cannot evolve unless they are organized in a modular way, where modular organization entails that each component of the system modulrity is, each module can be selected for change independently of the others.
First, global systems are unlikely to be associated with local brain architecture, thereby rendering them unpromising objects of neuroscientific study:.
The cognitive functions of language. An input system gets its information from the outside world via what he calls a “transducer” and converts it to something accessible to the central processor’s “thought”. This book is written in such a way that even lunkheads such as myself can get it.
Fodor writes with clarity and style, and presents complex experiments and ideas very appealingly. Vertical modular theories hold cognitive furniture to be domain-specific. Auditory illusions and confusions.
Cross-cultural evidence of cognitive adaptations for social exchange among the Shiwiar of Ecuadorian Amazonia. Paperbackpages. In short, the Argument from Design is susceptible to a number of objections. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Most psychologists study horizontal processes like memory and information flow; Fodor postulates a vertical and modular psychological organization underlying biologically coherent behaviors.
These two properties are correlated, in that outputs with more specific content tend to be more costly for a system to compute, and vice versa. On the contrary, it seems plausible that the internal operations kerry one system could be accessible to modulairty second system in virtue of a monitoring mechanism that functions the same way regardless of the details of the processing being monitored.
Arguably the most serious challenge to modularity at the level of input systems, however, comes from evidence that vision is cognitively penetrable, and hence, not informationally encapsulated.
The Modularity of Mind by Jerry A. Fodor
Shackelford Roger Shepard Peter K. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 3 The most amazing and basic thing about the mind is that it parses The hypothesis of modest modularity, as we shall call it, has two strands. Big modulariy on my scientific thinking, ever since reading it as an undergraduate.
Reactions may occur instinctively consistent with innate knowledge even if a person has not learned such knowledge. Fodor on Cognition, Modularity, and Adaptationism. Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers.
Modularity of mind
There was a faculty of memory, a faculty of judgment, and so on. Academic Tools How to cite this entry.
Thoroughly enjoyed this book. Fodor’s dry humor and deep familiarity with relevant empirical results redeemed the occasionally abstruse discussion. Although he argued for the modularity of “lower level” cognitive processes in Modularity of Mind he also argued that higher level cognitive processes are not modular since they have dissimilar properties.