ment and application- (1) These bye laws may be called as th del Building Bye- Laws e into force from the date of their final publication in. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE. SCHEDULE II. (Bye with the building bye-laws of City of Bangalore Bye-law No. 4 and I forward herewith the. Rule of the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-Laws, , the petitioner was not required to have any sanctioned plan Date: 31 Jul,
| Author: | Nikojind Vudoll |
| Country: | Brazil |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Technology |
| Published (Last): | 5 December 2016 |
| Pages: | 190 |
| PDF File Size: | 9.36 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 12.89 Mb |
| ISBN: | 498-5-92447-399-5 |
| Downloads: | 54590 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Digami |
Madras High Court Jammu and Kashmir High Court 2. Now when the building has risen beyond three floors and bowing to strong complaints, a demolition notice was issued in December and the owner has obtained a stay order.
Presently, though the Revised Master Plan and the Zoning Regulations has come into force with the approval of the State Government on Blue Nile Advertising Pvt. Calcutta High Court 2. Further reference is also made to the documents obtained under the RTI Act and filed along with the rejoinder statement. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Though that is the position, the Mahanagara Palike cannot continue to approve the construction plan under the Bye-laws itself insofar as the specifications as it would be contrary to the Master Plan and Regulations prepared by the Planning Authority which has the jurisdiction to plan and specify regarding the development and constructions in the area.
The relevant portion is quoted Ananthakrishna Murthy and Sri Ramanjaneya Gowda, respective learned counsel for the respondents and perused the petition papers. Central Information Commission 0. National Green Tribunal No Case or Topic can be added. Upload pleading to use the new AI search.
Armed Forces Tribunal 0.
Koramangala building shows the way to flout BBMP bye-laws
It is therefore contended that the approval of such plan for construction is contrary to the Building Bye-laws of the first respondent.
The petitioners, led by Mr.
Cricket Football Tennis Others. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission 0.
Appellate Tribunal For Forfeited Property1 0. You have reach your max limit.
Click to upgrade Your Package to have this feature. Appellate Tribunal For Foreign Exchange 0. It is the case of the petitioner that the height of the building being constructed by the contesting respondents is admittedly 10 mtrs. It is in that context, keeping in view the fact that the Master Plan which had been prepared and approved earlier was more than ten years, the Revised Master Plan has been prepared by the BDA regarding Zoning of Land Use and Regulations and the same is approved by the State Government on It is mandatory under Clause Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for.
Unauthorized Request Blocked
Jharkhand Nuilding Court 1. Koramangala building shows the way to flout BBMP bye-laws. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The said property has now been purchased by the respondent Nos. The Corporation should always act in aid of the building bye – laws. Central Administrative Tribunal 1.
Buildkng OPs are engaged in running the st business of building and developing housing schemes.
The fact is the BBMP knew it all along, thanks to vigilant neighbours who kept the area engineer vye the loop about the deviations. Rajasthan High Court 4. Bombay High Court Since the appeal is pending, it would not be appropriate to express any opinion in that regard.
Mrs Yashodha Rao vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara on 31 July,
Jammu and Kashmir High Court. Here’s why you won’t hear Kannada at Be Securities Appellate Tribunal 0. Relaxation of the Regulations would mean the nullification of the Rules themselves and Chhattisgarh High Court 0.
Further, the question of considering the consequential action would not arise in the instant case when the approval of the plan itself is not found to be illegal. Let’s work together to keep the conversation civil. Dhaka High Court 0.