Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.
|Published (Last):||21 July 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
You can take each muawoya one by one and see the biographies of their narrators compiled by the scholars of Hadith. In the first century, even it was not possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political air not religious.
When the matter is only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them. Respected Sister Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Many thanks for your kind words and comments about my books. I read the book thoroughly but I am sorry instead of making me satisfy it has made me more doubtful. I appreciate that you study the history.
Because I am the student of history and I know what the Amir Muawia did in his 20 years rule. Since the matter is grave, we should evaluate the authenticity of the events reported by the history.
If some Sahaba had something wrong, Allah will not ask us about that but if they were really acquitted from that, we will be held responsible in front of Allah for believing in reports transmitted through doubtful channels.
Dear Brother Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Thank you very much for answering me. Details of this procedure are available here: So why should we accept narrations from such people who portray a bad picture of such personalities?
Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani
We should consider the following facts about these issues: It is very logical. New articles and books are added this website on 1 st of each month.
Large number of narrators who reported the incidents related to the civil wars of companion’s time were biased against the companions. I repeat the names: Thank you very much for answering me. Why should we rely on secondary sources? If the answer is yes, we should go for it but if the answer is no, why to conduct a debate on an issue that has not been settled haqakq last 14 centuries. Although mistakes at individual capacity was possible but how could you believe that all companions committed a great crime collectively while the evidence against them is nothing except statements of a few people whose reliability is already under question?
Because in this way you can say that Zia- ul-Haq ruled for 11 years because he was a very patient person. I respect the author of this book but it seems like he is just playing with the words. Only that person will reach at a real conclusion who was present at that occasion and bears eyewitness of an sur.
Hazrat Muawiya( R. A) Aur Tarikhi Haqaiq : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
The same procedure could be applied to historical reports as well. Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias or Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa. We cannot naqaiq about a theory that “it definitely has happened.
All other history books of subsequent periods were written based on Tabari’s work. Therefore, the issue becomes extremely grave.
Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad Saqib Risalpuri
Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah. Nobody engages tareekni a revolt with a qur of companions including his family members and young children. A riwaiat is not authentic because the rawi is shia and the same time another riwaiat by a shia rawi is authentic because it favours his opinion And then he tried to convert the muslim khilafat into malookiat. I hope you ll not think that I am a Shia because ‘I am not’.
My objective of providing you with the book was to demonstrate that two points of view exist on this issue and both groups have their own arguments based on the reports compiled by Imam Tabari. If the matter is not much disturbing, I’ll urge you to leave the matter to Allah. There is no doubt that the incident of Karbala is a grave incident of our history.
The length of yaqaiq period is not a sign of patients. Musharrif ruled for 9 years because he is very patient.
Tarsekhi we accept the narrations portraying himself as a dictator, the matter will not remain limited to him. We know that some people are biased towards Hazrat Abu BakrU’mar.
Although we are not sure about authenticity of such reports. If you know Arabic, you should study the history from its original source.