Professorial Fellow Institute for Social Justice. Sidney Morgenbesser Professor of Philosophy, Columbia University. Professor Akeel Bilgrami joined the Institute. Democratic Culture: Historical and Philosophical Essays (Critical Interventions in Theory and Praxis). 26 April by Akeel Bilgrami. In a rigorous exploration of how secularism and identity emerged as conflicting concepts in the modern world, Akeel Bilgrami elaborates a notion of secular.
| Author: | Mira Vudosida |
| Country: | Barbados |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Software |
| Published (Last): | 8 November 2013 |
| Pages: | 392 |
| PDF File Size: | 13.40 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 14.95 Mb |
| ISBN: | 925-7-84855-411-9 |
| Downloads: | 20738 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Yozshujin |
As a philosopher, what do you have to say on this low regard for a subject like philosophy in India? Matthias Kiesselbach – – Acta Analytica 29 4: Inventories of the Present. I think these sources of the tension between liberty and equality were central to their rejection of both ideals, even if they did not put akeek in just the way I have. Meaning, Understanding and Normativity.
What are the similarities of thought in Gandhi and Marx and how do you explain it in the context of modernity? Akeel Bilgrami born is an Indian philosopher of language and mind. Of course, the different historical and social contexts of these traditions sometimes make for different issues being salient in each, but that is equally true within the same tradition at different historical times. Professor Bilgrami has two relatively independent sets of intellectual interests–in the Philosophy of Mind and Language, and in Political Philosophy and Moral Psychology especially as they surface in politics, political economy, history, and culture.
Pinpointing the basic weaknesses and the Eurocentric nature of modernity as well as its domination by ameel politics, Bilgrami seeks to find a theoretical framework by which one can go biogrami the constriction of possibilities that liberalism and the merely regulatory constraints of bilggrami democracy have forced on modern societies.
Gandhi, Marx & the ideal of an ‘unalienated life’
It is simply to deny the akel and preponderance of liberalism in shaping modernitywhich, to this day, has a dominant hold on society and is even entirely complicit, I would argue, with the bilgtami right-wing populist efforts to oppose it. As a result, for him, the communicative function of language is quite ancillary. However, can you attribute and find out some basic characters and ideas of Indian philosophy.
Rather, they change the subject. When I began to read Gandhi in the early s, I realised—slowly, reluctantly, overcoming my upbringing—that he was a far deeper and far more original thinker than Nehru. All that has changed now.
Tyler Burge – – Journal of Philosophy 83 December: How and when did we transform the concept of nature to the concept of natural resources? David Duarte – – Ratio Juris 24 2: His nonsense books, mo ….
Search results
His writings in the other central area of his intellectual interests, political philosophy and moral psychology, have significantly influenced and continue to influence our public discourse on politics, ideology, religion, modernity, culture and history. You list a number of portmanteau terms towards the end of your question to summarise recent theoretical critical angles on modernity.
Talmage – – Erkenntnis 40 2: He is presently working on a book on the relations between value, agency, and practical reason. Of course, many who sought independence from colonial rule were not opposed to imperialism in any deep way, so they never accepted this simple point. Even where one disagreed with him, one saw how strikingly independent his thinking was, how he came to familiar issues from gilgrami angles. At a time when secularist and religious worldviews appear irreconcilable, Akeel Bilgrami strikes out on a path distinctly his own, criticizing secularist proponents and detractors, liberal universalists and aakeel relativists alike.
And my thought has been that if we remove liberty and equality—riddled with inner tension as they are—from the theoretical centre stage that they have had in European modernity and put on centre stage instead the ideal of an unalienated life, then one can bring liberty and equality back from the back door, as it were but no longer as central now, but only as necessary conditions for this more fundamental ideal that is on centre stage.
This is aekel reasons that have been well-studied such as, for instance, most conspicuously the fact that the possession of property bestowed on the possessor a notion of liberty that became erected into the law of the land as a fundamental right everywhere in the spread of liberal modernity.
Professor Akeel Bilgrami – Institute for Social Justice – Professor Akeel Bilgrami
I think, actually, that this is a preposterous view. And, how and when did we transform the concept of knowledges to live by into the concept of expertise to rule by?
When I said all this, I was, first of all, only suggesting that Gandhi did not think that what is bad in us could be put right by politics. How do you intellectually deal with the concept of modernity?
This reading of Gandhi and Marx as replacing the ideals of liberty and equality does not mean that those ideals are irrelevant. It completely distorts things to see the Enlightenment as a mere ragbag of doctrines and ideas in which Locke and Mill and Hegel and Marx can all be thrown in. So, he is focussed on something relatively limited and he is very modest about these self-consciously imposed limitations.
Much less well-studied is another source of the tension between liberty and equality, which comes from the incentivisation of talent that owes bilgraml liberty attaching to notions of dessert. But apart from such contextually determined differences, which can occur within and across traditions of philosophy, I really do feel that most philosophical traditions, however different their conceptual vocabularies and methods are, by and akerl focus on the same conceptual issues.
A lot of my work has been struggling with that question. Our recent titles are available via Edelweiss.
He has argued in many essays that in our modern world, “religion is not primarily a matter of belief and doctrine but about the sense of community and shared values it provides in contexts where other forms of solidarity—such as a strong labor movement—are missing.
Strawson and a very fiery, hellishly intelligent, much younger person called Gareth Evans, who died ameel early.
He is contracted to bilggami two small books in the very near future, one called What is a Muslim? His writings and philosophical ideas on the themes of secularism, modernity, Marxism and Gandhi have produced new perspectives on these and contributed significantly to our intellectual debates.